Summer Series of Saves: analysis is life

@gacruz_phd

“Try That in a Small Town”, Polysemy, and Ideological Fragments #teachersoftiktok #popculture #phd #academia #jasonaldean #music #greenscreen

♬ original sound – Dr. C

Key phrases I learned from his video, ones I knew, and all of them I need to share with students:

Ideological fragment: Dr. Cruz explores how a piece of media can be an ideological fragment, meaning a piece or artifact that represents an larger ideology (belief system).

Transgressions: Wrong-doing against others.

Extralegal: Definition (not sanctioned by the law)

Polysemy: having multiple meanings

Yes, I did Venmo him some cash for his content. You should, too.

Now, next school year when I provide instruction on analyzing media (literature, poetry, videos, etc.) and through the lens of facts, opinions, and truth, as well as poetry instruction (revised from Mud & Ink) What an amazing #mentortext to discuss our purposes for analyzing and discussing the media we consume.

Summer Series of Saves: Dr. Candy

The “Reading Wars” confuses the boogers out of me. I was encouraged to listen to “Sold a Story” by Emily Hanford, and was completely befuddled over…what? Three cueing what? Fountas & Pinnell were just writers of leveled texts, and I had no idea that phonics wasn’t being taught in some districts, etc. I haven’t listened to the podcast since my first listen, but I remember the overall sense that something was right about it. That tingly sense that while it was assembled as hard-hitting journalism, it is a documentary, and documentaries have bias. And whew, boy, is there a lot of bias.

And this is where things get tricky: that bias is important and led to a grand conversation about how to teach reading. But — maybe in my silly little Masters’ cohort of about a dozen or so adults obtaining their Masters in Ed., from a local university collaborating with a local school district, our mentor, Dr. Candy Schulhauser, was an absolute rock-star, genius, amazing provider of K-8 literacy instruction. We got it all: fluency, comphrension, neuroscience, read-alouds, reading intervention, instructional and recreational reading, the problems with whole language (which is something, I suspect, the warriors for the “Science of Reading” folks confuse with balanced literacy).

I don’t know what Dr. S is doing these days. I do know that almost 20 years later, I still have all the books, hand-outs, and the strong foundation of teaching children to read. The bonus outcome is helping them love to read, and become confident readers and critical thinkers.My Master’s Thesis was titled something along the lines of “Using Engaging Children’s Literature…” and I am still a hug fan of Grant & Wiggins, introduced by Dr. S, and Understanding by Design.

There is something about being a classroom teacher as long as I’ve been one: I’m at that point where I’ve seen things come and go, and folks panicking when new things come out, and putting aside the old. Sometimes the old needs to go, but sometimes it doesn’t. I feel like there is something else going on that we’re not ready to admit, and I’m not sure what that is yet. There are parents who did everything they were “supposed to do” to help their child read– reading aloud, having shelves of books, etc., and still their child struggled. And I’m just throwing out wonderings right now:

I wonder:

  • Are we not providing enough context, background knowledge, and schema building for all students?
  • Are we passing students too quickly instead of providing more art, PE, and creative time to help build their growing brains? Or just passing and putting them into more remedial help?
  • Are we teaching to the test, meaning just a focus on isolated skills and not enough strategies to help students use and foster their metacognitive skills (know when they are lost)?
  • Are we bypassing small motor skills and key brain development activities like handwriting practice and cursive?
  • Are we not giving kids enough playtime and socializing time? Build the stories and their own narratives?
  • When new practices or a review of prior practices are introduced, do most educators and parents panic instead of taking a nuanced and inventory of practices? (Thinking about how Visual Learning and Hattie’s work got so misunderstood and misused.)

Well, I am not sure. I have my opinions and my anecdotal observations. That and $4 will buy a latte and all that — however, I am grateful I had a sensible, knowledgeable expert to help me and the other educators in the cohort understand and become experts on literacy. Things change, and being a professional practitioner means keeping the good and learning about “new-good.” I just don’t think what Hanford had to sell was “new good” for me and the others who received better teaching instruction. (I must mention, I also appreciate Stephen Krashen’s work on diving into the points and issues with the Science of Reading folks.)

Some resources I’ll be diving into that will work for my students moving forward:

#thematic #Thursday

There is a passionate Shakespearean scholar on TikTok, and she does a phenomenal job of analyzing Shakespeare.

But damn, she’s a little mean. If she had been my teacher back in 1980 or whenever I had to read Romeo and Juliet, I would never have picked up another one of his works.

Allow me to explain.

This is the first year I feel like a “real” high school English teacher. Yes, a dash of imposter syndrome along with circumstances. This is year 17, and while years 14-16 were at an alternative high school, many of my instructional chops got a little rusty. And I’m not here to debate the merits or disadvantages of my district’s curriculum policies: each ELA grade teaches core texts. And as common practice, from what I understand, Romeo and Juliet is often taught in freshmen year. I’ve done “light” mentor text instruction with excerpts and plot years ago (the use of cause and effect is a wonderful structure to explore with R&J); we middle school ELA teachers were roundly told to back off and not touch. Okay, okay! Onward.

Now, one of the stories I shared this past year, and will share again, is that for me, Shakespeare was hard when I was in high school. That was back in the day when the teacher would assign a text and walk away. Having been the ‘smart kid’ and a voracious reader all my life, getting Elizabethan language tossed in my lap was daunting. I am sure I drove my ’73 Buick LeSabre (a gift from my grandparents) to the nearest bookstore and snatched up a copy of the Cliff Notes. That saved me, but I felt like a fraud and, quite frankly, stupid. But at least I understood the story. It wasn’t until many years later that I watched a version of Hamlet, and the light bulb went off: I got it. These are plays meant to be seen. And heard. And felt.

ALSO: and this is huge — they are meant to be triangulated*. Through watching, listening, reading, discussing, debating, contextualizing, and, dare I say — translating — using all of my skills as an ELA teacher, ELL/MLL, and as simply a human who loves good stories and hearing what folks have to say about them.

And, look, I know I get just as frustrated with other teachers as this creator does about the teacher to whom she replied. I get frustrated when other teachers continue to use racial slurs ‘because it’s in the text.” I get frustrated when other teachers are fascists. *Shrug.* I get frustrated when teachers tell students to put quotation marks inside the ending punctuation. But I never get frustrated when teachers or students are doing their best to contextualize. (Hope that’s some good scotch or whiskey in her glass.)

Here are a few anecdotes from our recent unit on Romeo & Juliet:

  • Students asked why, in the Luhrmann version of the play/film, he used modern settings/clothing and kept the Shakespearean language: and I demonstrated Romeo falling on his knees, crying, “I am fortune’s fool!” versus “Wow, I am a chump.” It allowed us to see the story’s timelessness and not focus on clothing from the late 1500s.
  • Before the scene where Juliet’s father strikes her mother and tells Juliet she can die on the streets for all he cares, I gave a content warning. Many students witness domestic violence, so I must provide context to this scene. So, in the TikTok creator’s argument about how the parents were not disconnected, she makes a good point. But students are also going to judge stories by the context of their own histories and generational structures, and even though Lord Capulet shows his love and care for his daughter by finding her a good match, I hate to say it, lady, but kids these days aren’t going to think he’s a good dad. But that would be a really good question for them to discuss: are the parents disconnected?
  • We also considered (because the ELA department came up with it) this question, “Who’s to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet?” and the students did not fail when discussing it. I offered that because Tybalt is so angry and ready to fight with Romeo at the ball, but Lord Capulet stops him; what would have happened if Tybalt had never sought Romeo out? In our opinion, Tybalt continues the generational trauma/feud. A case could be made for Tybalt being “at fault.” I think this is a distracting question in some regards, but it does help students begin to frame strong argumentative writing/thinking.

By allowing myself to be real, vulnerable, and honest about my relationship with reading Shakespeare, I allowed the 15-16-year-olds in my instructional care to take risks. They trust me. It’s okay to not be the smartest person in the room, and collaboratively make meaning about something. And they always have some new insight to share. I certainly would never say to them they’re being reductive and pointless. I’m going to go back to Louise Roseblatt’s concepts of transactional reading:

@kellylove100

Replying to @violaswamphadapoint

♬ original sound – Kelly LoveX

“Through the medium of words, the text brings into the reader’s consciousness certain concepts, certain sensuous experiences, certain images of things, people, actions, scenes. The special meanings and, more particularly, the submerged associations that these words have for the individual reader will largely determine what the work communicates to him. The reader brings to the work personality traits, memories of past events, present needs and preoccupations, a particular mood of the moment, and a particular physical condition. These and many other elements in a never-to-be-duplicated combination determine his response to the peculiar contribution of the text.”
― Louise M. Rosenblatt, Literature as Exploration

So, perhaps that’s my own ELA/NBCT, M. Ed., flex that I’m leaning on Rosenblatt.

And the Cliff Notes. (Now Spark Notes.)

PS They loved the graphic novel version, too, which led to a great discussion about when it does or does not matter about a character’s race.

…of Fascists

A Terror of Fascists

A Nightmare of Fascists

A Bloodclot of Fascists

Well, it’s kind of a shame on my part that I didn’t monetize this blog before the trolls found it, because whew-boy-howdy, were my stats booming! This silly little place where I collect my thoughts, lesson ideas, share joy, and sometimes sorrows received attention. I almost wrote “unwanted” attention. And while no one wants hate speech directed at them, I’ve chosen not to take it personally, because it’s not about the individual. Their hate is the most equalitarian thing about them: they hate and fear everyone, even themselves. (I might remain a little salty over family members who’ve been complicit in this fear-mongering, but that’s my personal issue.)

We all know this.

Case in point: this woman had her sidewalk cleared of snow by two generous young men, and this is her shaking and crying in fear in her garage, and calling the police on them. This is what the fear and propaganda machines have done. They have completely fear-baited this woman to the point of a mental crisis, and her calling the cops on this young man could have ended with him being killed.

@tizzyent

YT Woman Tears: Not just for YT women, @lonzogambino has the full encounter.

♬ Creepy and simple horror background music(1070744) – howlingindicator
This creator, @TizzyEnt, does an excellent job of revealing the identities of racist, bigoted, and dangerous people. And while we may applaud internet vigilantism, unfortunately, the average person doesn’t have the following nor the funding when attacked by the fascists. It’s me. I’m the average person.

We all know this.

It’s about well-funded, targeted attacks at whole communities, taking them apart, dividing them, one by one, feeling the rush of “gotchas” and “whataboutisms” until some of us wake up and realize we’ve been in a war of attrition and they’re winning. BIPOC folks, Indigenous, and women* (we’ll get into the white women later), have known this forever. And if it was my turn to draw their time and funding/energy at me, okay. I haven’t done anything wrong. In fact, I must be doing something right if they sicced their media dogs on me.

We all know this.

@prof.zeitgeist

The fight against fascism: an incomplete & insufficient playbook

♬ original sound – Zeitgeist

We’ve been watching our country turn to fascist ideologies off and on for…ever. Start with 1492, and Columbus’s genocide. Start with 1619, when enslaved persons came to the colonies. Time and again when white women keep voting for their abusers and have never seen to get out of this cult. We know white suffragettes didn’t intend for women of color to have the same rights. And all anyone can do is learn from the past, and do better. It’s the ‘do better’ part that seems to have some folks in a tailspin because for them to do better, they would need to adjust their beliefs to love their fellow humans, be kind, show grace, and mercy, and just promote life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. What’s so funny about peace, love, and understanding?

We all know this.

@blerdronner

#stitch with @prof.zeitgeist watch the entire video I’m stitching. The rise of #fascism in this country is alarming. #rondesantis #trump #stopfascists #antifa #election2024 #politics #lgbtqally #bipoc #blerdronner

♬ original sound – Blerd Ronner

Sometimes students share something that is causing them harm. We, teachers, have been saying for years to add counselors, mental health experts, and other social and emotional services to buildings. To say that there has been pushback is an understatement. Fortunately for students, at least in my state, we understand the laws: there are counselors and family liaisons, and the goal is to provide transparent and equitable conversations for families and their children. We are mandated reporters. I keep my personal political and religious opinions to myself and teach critical thinking skills, respect families’ and cultural values, and create an inclusive environment for students and their families. I have welcomed parents and guardians into my room. I am media literate and understand the signs of indoctrination. History, literature, the arts, science, math, and other life skills and artisan education provide a wide variety of experiences for students in a public education setting. (Is it equitable across the nation? Nope.) So when someone says “stick to academics,” absolutely.

But in other states, such as Texas, being a teacher is fraught with political ideologies that attack not only someone doing their job but the very families they serve. And if my little opinion is attacked, trust me, as I’ve been saying — they are moving forces to all states. They are fighting a new, digital Civil War. It’s heartbreaking to witness this, in real-time.

We all know this.

And our children grow up. They make their own decisions. And that’s terrifying for some families. And adults with children who do not want their children to grow up and make decisions for themselves, and will blame anyone but their own actions. So when an adolescent shares with a friend that their mom will kick them out of the house if they are LGTBQ+, or a student breaks up with a boyfriend, we’re the first line of defense. We share with students that there are adults who care about them, and we can provide support. Parents and guardians are always informed. There are no secrets. And over the years, I’ve told students this value of mine: they are someone’s child, and it is an honor for me to be their teacher. For my own children, I wanted them to be adults whom I’d like to know. Kind, funny, smart, and caring. And that’s what my spouse and I have. And I believe most parents want this, too.

We all know this.

We all know this.

I added this one because they are doing amazing work. We still have so far to go.

We all know this.

We all know this.

I deactivated my Twitter account. As my spouse said, El00n Muuusk weaponized the trolls, gave them all blue checks, and then put a dome over it. So, looking at my circle of control (which is an illusion, but it’s my illusion, and right now, it’s all I’ve got), I’m going to do what my Twitter tagline said since 2009, the quote by Mary Oliver, “…what are you doing to do with your one wild and precious life?” What indeed.

Here’s my list of 99 problems I typed up in 2018.

Our Primary Documents and the Digital Age

How do we keep our history when others control it?

Around my house, stored in nooks, boxes, caches, and crannies, sit decades of dragon-like mounds of paper: photographs, old love letters, mementos, the ephemera of a lifetime. I don’t lose things, either, by and large: we’re still searching for the Pokemon card binder, and an autographed Superman doll (signed by astronomer David H. Levy) Oh, and my great-grandmother’s pearl necklace I borrowed, but that is long gone. Okay, so maybe I do lose some important artifacts. But one lie I’ve been sold as a digital explorer from its early days is that the ‘internet is forever.’

Nothing is forever.

A billionaire “bought” a digital space that I’ve been on since 2009. I never garnered more than 5K followers and plateaued at around 4,700. And when I say “bought,” I mean I sense it’s all Monopoly money — fake, just numbers on a screen somewhere, financed by other billionaires and shady nations to decimate and destroy a democratized platform. We, those of us who are not billionaires, are the ones who made them the billionaires and gave away our power, our histories, to their control and whims.

And our human brains–why do we focus on the negative? Oh, I know why, but also — why? Or rather, how do we rewire our stories, our narratives, to gather the good and wholesome? Some of my happiest, chock-full-of-goodness moments occurred when some of my favorites followed me back. I felt included, invited, and smart.

Some of my worst moments happened when I was invited, and then disinvited. Sharply. Rebuked. Ghosted.

But that is life. And our lives we shared in that space– we met one another, shared heartbreak, grief, joy, victories, a whole manner of digital thoughts, and ideas, and gave space. But none of that can go in a box, or pulled out in an album when one megalomaniac uses his vast fortune to burn down our words, our lives.

Chaos agents are burning it down.

Just to see it burn…

It’s not our personal stories. It’s our global story.

https://twitter.com/PortiaMcGonagal/status/1594003502170222592?s=20&t=8nxWXMrk-5Tj9kj5kUWFpg

And maybe I’m taking the bird’s eye view (cliche intended) –our little primary documents, our archives of our lives, are small and precious only to us. Those in power, historically, seem only capable of manipulating historical narratives to their advantage and narcissism. Control of information is control of the world, or so they imagine. How do we fight back?

Keep sharing your stories. Keep writing your stories. We are the storytellers, and we are the gifts to one another, and the history keepers.

Now, off to go do something else and try to keep my stories safe. I can wrap them in tissue packing boxes. And keep matches of billionaires away from them.

Photograph of dog ornament on a yuletide tree with red beads

And damn, where is that charm bracelet?

Featured Image: Edith Rimmington ~ The Oneiroscopist, 1947

Screams in the void…

The history of horror and how it relates to current media: a reflection of the screams of youth

(There might be spoilers ahead for those who haven’t yet finished #UmbrellaAcademy and #StrangerThings)

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The above tweet shows how voices matter. Keept telling misogynistic asshats to shut up.

One of my hobbies is to make connections or timelines of..things. In this case, it’s the thematic overtones of horror movies.

Note: many of these films are centered on racist, bigoted tropes.

This is by no means an exhaustive, curated list:

And we also have the series, binge-worthy media consumption of streaming now. While we are not going to movie theatres (well, some of you are…) if we can we’ve created environments in our homes that allow us to consume some amazing writing and filmmaking. You’re welcome to go down the rabbit holes of links and movies at your leisure: this post is about one thing I’ve noticed in current horror — the scream of power.

Two recent series I’ve watched, “The Umbrella Academy” and “Stranger Things” use what I’m calling the scream of power. In Umbrella, the actor, Elliot Page, a trans man, his character began as Vanya and in Season 3, is Viktor. The writing is beautiful, tender, and Elliot is sublime. He is truly magnificent. And while the character Vanya used her powers to use sound/sonic waves to destroy, Viktor grows into his powers. When he reunites with Harlan, his compassion and grief manifest into more protective powers.

Now, Umbrella Academy perhaps isn’t horror; it’s science fiction/fantasy, but the horrors the characters, born in 1989 with incredible superpowers, face is very real. They confront the past horrors of racism, homophobia, transphobia, and bigotry. The connection I’m sensing is what ideas define and shape the characteristics in present sense: how are we grappling, through literature/film (and yes, “Umbrella” and “Stranger Things” are literature and I will fight you)

Elliot Page as Viktor Hargreeves

Viktor’s powers allow him to manipulate sound waves as he wishes, converting them into energy that he can then use in any number of ways, from telekinesis to flight. Just like the powers of his Umbrella Academy siblings, Viktor shows there are many creative ways his unique skill can be applied. He can convert soundwaves into bright white, destructive energy, and can create protective barriers strong enough to stop bullets. While this may sound straightforward, Viktor also demonstrates other abilities that are not obviously related to the manipulation of sound waves in the Netflix series. He has super hearing and can manipulate the weather and matter in general, as seen when his clothes and eyes change color.

https://screenrant.com/umbrella-academy-viktor-powers-sound-energy-explained/

Elliot/Viktor finds his voice. And his sister, Allison, continues to harbor immense grief, as her voice and powers shift, too. I’m watching Allison’s character arc closely — is this the grief and despair of losing her child, Black, experiencing the hatred of racism past and present? She represents the generational voice and trauma of her gender, race, and lack of agency–we all need to watch her arc carefully and with compassion, because right now, her character is being written as unredeemable, and that doesn’t sit right with me.

Shifting to Stranger Things, El’s character is a big, powerful voice in a tiny body.

There was a thread recently about GenX which said a lot of things which resonated with many, but did not include BIPOC experiences. When I watch Stranger Things, it provides a thin slice into looking back on my own adolescence. No, it cannot do everything. It should, and perhaps this will lead the way to more stories that center BIPOC voices and experiences. The characters Erica and Lucas Sinclair are central to the story, Lucas especially. And this scene describes the bullying of my generation, and it’s relatable to many generations. White kids making sure their privilege and power is maintained.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

We consume and reflect media through the lens of our current status, our present tense: Vecna is the Christo-fascist movement. It infilitrated everything. He was harmed by Papa. He was created by El. And the monster seeks to destroy all — and here we are. We better figure out how to be inclusive, powerful, and share our gifts to set things right. Because they’ve been wrong since the beginning: the seeds of our nations grew in blood, destruction, colonialism, lies, weapons, disease, and mythology. El finds her voice, again and again. When will we adults listen?

The first hint that something might be different this time came the morning after the shootings, from a Douglas High School sophomore named Sarah Chadwick, who informed the President of the United States, via his favorite medium, in words that quickly went viral, “I don’t want your condolences you fucking piece of shit, my friends and teachers were shot.” 

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/three-days-in-parkland-florida

a plan, of sorts

just making a list

@kellylove100 #duet with @ted_alexandro #standup ♬ original sound – Ted Alexandro
https://www.tiktok.com/embed.js

Just trying to capture some of the ideas before they fly out of my head:

Summer Reading:

Note: want to re-read Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler: I read The Handmaid’s Tale around the time it was published in 1985 and it truly scared the soul of out me: Parable was published in 1993, and many have said Atwood got so many things wrong and white-centered in Handmaid’s, and I need to look at Parable/Butler with a keener eye. And while I never read Beloved, I did see the movie, and that’s not enough. It’s long past time.

Akata Witch Novel Unit

For next year, a colleague in another building wants to collaborate with me on a novel unit for Akakta Witch by Nnedi Okorafor. Stay tuned: this is my passion and joy.

Multimodal Unit

Pst: kelly …yeah…don’t forget to save your work that you did on the multimodal PD, mkay?

Write that book.

Plan equitable portfolio and project practices.

try to get some rest

Visit your dad in Texas

Parents & Guardians

TL: DR Meetings with parents and guardians can be made simpler and with more care.

A little story:

Many years ago, I saw the need for an alternative to the current ASB (Associated Student Body) group. The ASB at the time was comprised of very highly motivated, engaged, and energetic students who also understood the “rules of school.” Mind you, and I’m saying this clearly so there is no misunderstanding: the ASB leader and students were amazing. And, it was not a club where everyone/anyone could join. It’s based on elections and voting and is often a popularity contest.

via GIPHY

So, I asked my students if they were interested in starting their own club. They were mostly Black and multi-racial girls, about six of them, many of whom had negative experiences in school. They decided to go with the club name of Royal Queens because the feeder high school they’d be attending next year are the Royals, and yes, they were Queens. Okay, cool. Got permission from one of the assistant principals, (one of the most amazing women I’ve ever known) and carried on.

The girls did projects like, on Valentine’s for example, put a valentine heart on every single locker (over 600) from them. Some kids said it was the first Valentine they’d ever received. They would get a special pass to go help with projects around the school. And yes, sometimes — they took advantage of this or were a little disruptive for some teachers, and yes, I had at least two other teachers* complain about them. But they had fun, and so many of them grew and matured, and are loving young adults today. Just an amazing bunch of students.

Pausing to a parent meeting with one of the girls, “T.” T was imaginative, intelligent, funny, joyous, and a loyal and fierce friend to her peers. For some reason, she was in trouble, and we were called into a parent meeting. The other teachers* were ready to attack. They said their piece about how awful and disrespectful “T” was. When it was my turn, I told her mom that T was part of this club, worked really hard, and from everything I could tell did an amazing job of advocating for herself, and many other positive things. Her mom just stopped and stared at me for a second and said, “This is the first time a teacher has ever said anything good about my daughter.”

So.

Okay.

This doesn’t work for every situation, content area, teaching style, or student. I’m trying to coalesce concepts that are not easily filtered.

Parents and guardians want their children to do well. To thrive. Generational trauma, systemic racism, and white supremacy create a toxic mix when parents come into a meeting about their child. Add to that our own experiences we bring to the room, and our beliefs about parenting. The assumptions, stereotypes, and white savior tropes get in the way of many (white) teachers. Clear that away from one moment of clarity and just remember: no matter how good or bad you think the parent/guardian is sitting across from you, there is a blood bond between them and that child in the room, too. Our role is not only to deliver instruction and to ensure their child strives for mastery of that content area but to be and grow to who they are — that’s it. And it’s a collective, nourishing growth. They, students, can show up with love and self-respect. Do not demand respect from students and parents when you have not modeled self-respect.

When it comes to grades, oh boy, nothing upsets many teachers more than when I say don’t markdown for late work. Just don’t. If a student has nothing turned in, build a system in place, especially for older students, where they can call or text their parents to let them know. They always have their parent’s number, even if the grading software isn’t updated. In the age of digital grading systems and alerts, I promise you — speaking from my own experience – all the alerts in the world will not help a parent of a child who has #ADHD or other neurodiversity. And if the parent also has ADHD (ahem) she is most likely doing their best to function in the workplace as well as tend to a child who is struggling to stay organized. And please — throw out this “real world” notion that the real world only functions in a linear, time-demanding way. Notice I didn’t say always — I said only. There are many ways the world functions. People have depression, ADHD, autism, and many other cognitive demands. This does not mean whatever you’re asking them to go can’t be done. It means you’re going to have to work WITH parents/guardians and students to make it work for them. That’s it.

Asset-based mindsets, accurate diagnosis, continuous reflection, and readjustments. And for goodness sakes, just say something good, okay? OH AND FOLLOW THAT IEP/504. This is not a war of attrition against parents where teachers are “winning” something. The cruelty, egos, and overall garbage I’ve witnessed are egregious. But as Mr. Rogers says, I look for the helpers. Who’s in charge of making sure the education law and rules are followed? Who’s in charge of the grading practices and equity? What is my role in the following and adherence to the laws? Quite a large one, actually, as are most teachers.

If there are serious issues, such as gang-related, criminal activity (and no, sorry, crop tops and spaghetti straps don’t count) those are issues that are at the administrative level. At this time in my career, I will do whatever is in my power to disrupt and stop the school-to-prison pipeline. But if it’s reached that point before the student is in front of me, I will still do what I can. This might mean offering an online course for a student, making my time and instructional available in flexible hours, whatever. This does not mean this is a choice other teachers can and should make.

One thing I’m “good” at, which came with a lot of tears and hard learning, is how to interact with parents and guardians in meetings. I’m not naturally good, or…perhaps I am. I took something in my personality and experiences and reflected many times over the years — what would I need and want to hear if I was on the other side of this table? And, with my second son, I was on the other side of the table. I learned so much.

I’m going to offer this to any teacher, veteran, or rookie, this service: I will have a conversation about how to approach grades, discipline, and just an ear to listen — with this caveat — I will give advice and ask questions. You can ask me on Twitter @mrskellylove

Zealot.

TL:DR I am wondering if folks sometimes too narrowly focus on the one thing, instead of addressing the bigger, more challenging questions/issues.

A few things I’ll weave together:

  1. Recently had an exchange about books*
  2. My older son told me about his friend who’s become an “anti-natalist.”

The Venn Diagram in my mind connects in the middle with “both are filled with misogyny and arrogance.” * “Exchange” is a mild word — an exchange implies a sharing of ideas and points of view. This one became personal and downright ageist and misogynistic.

Instead of clearing his own heart the zealot tries to clear the world.

https://www.jcf.org/works/quote/instead-of-clearing-his-own-heart/

And to be clear, zealots don’t see themselves as fanatical, uncompromising, dogmatic, or narcissistic. Their solipsism prevents others’ points of view from entering their periphery. Just as a hard-line anti-abortionist feels about the zygotes, the anti-natalists feel about having a zygote in the first place. The zealot is a tarnished paladin, who may have the law on his side, but is not interested in justice. The paradox is their crusade might be what’s necessary and needed, but sometimes they engage in bad faith and do more harm than good.

Regarding the topic of books, (which I don’t have time or energy to tackle the antinatalists today, sorry, boys, take a number), it is well understood that the many forms of censorship, self-censorship, and opinions about what texts should and shouldn’t be used in classrooms, public and school libraries, has always been a burning topic. Literally.

But: when engaging with someone who will fight to have any book in a public school library, you will lose. And what might be lost will be more than the ‘right fighter’ zealot who got his way but destroyed so much more in his wake. Librarians are being let go. Libraries aren’t even being built in public schools any longer. Too many websites are blocked. Too many books are being pulled from shelves. It takes months, if not years, for books to be approved, if at all. So when a zealot fights to put one YA book on the middle school shelves, he may be right, but the consequences will take years to clean up. And who will clean up the mess? Other (women) teachers.

To this point:

https://bookriot.com/how-to-fight-book-bans-and-challenges/

Books saved my life. I am so glad and grateful things weren’t censored, and I am also kind of sad that some things I read were too pornographic for the age I saw them, and this is only because I didn’t have the context or schema. And I hope I say this clearly: it’s only a tricky area when one doesn’t provide the volume of information, guidance, and wealth of knowledge from experts in early child development. We have many great thinkers on this, including librarians, teachers, parents, doctors, psychologists, and more. People who have devoted their lives to understanding how to nurture curiosity and understanding of sexuality, sex, and a whole range of information. I mean, goodness, I had the blessing of having a mother who would answer any question, and it’s heartbreaking, unhealthy, and downright dangerous for children who don’t. And we, at least in North America, are a long way from destigmatizing sexual curiosity and removing shame from discussions about sex, our bodies, and our humanity. And #whitesupremacy takes its hold in censoring books on race, enslavement, and other historical facts. The current nightmare by white parents to ban CRT (critical race theory [which is taught in college, but ‘they’ don’t care] or Culturally Responsive Teaching is their fever-pitch response to maintain their privilege and power.)

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I can feel myself about to go into a long-winded, unproductive post. We are sexual beings. We want to know about our bodies, our feelings, and if we are ‘okay.’ Our children deserve our love and kindness to help them navigate their own lives. My energies, and I can only speak from here, are to make sure consent, comprehensive sexual education, and multiple historical perspectives are taught, discussed, and open. All of this does not rest on a single book. I’ve been fighting for almost two decades to make sure evolution, mythology, creation myths, and get great middle grade and YA books are in my classroom. What I will not tolerate is the zealot telling me what I think and believe. I see that bigger picture.

What can I do? Keep buying books for students. Keep creating and cultivating a safe place to share their ideas and questions, and do my best to help them find answers that will keep them healthy.

Some book lists for your libraries, too:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/dahliaadler/lgbtq-middle-grade-books

https://Ko-fi.com/home/coffeeshop?txid=c062598f-e499-4cda-b765-2ae63168d1cc&mode=public&img=ogiboughtsomeone

The author recommends this book for high school:

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I’m here to talk, discuss, and think about new ideas. And I’m grateful for so many who share their brilliant and clear ideas.

Postscript:

More writers to read, please:

https://booktoss.org/2021/01/08/dear-liberal-white-teachers/