Metacognitechnician

Forgive my portmanteau: I am operating on little sleep right now. A parent on my district’s unofficial Facebook group posed an interesting question of how technology is used, (or used poorly) in the classroom as the case may be. All I can speak to is my own experience, motivation, gumption, grit, and determination to continue and share my own relationship with technology and how I help students use it to their full advantage.

I am a digital pioneer, and still exploring the vast, unknown territories of technology.

Pardon, though, I’m going to take a well-deserved shortcut and post links to past posts concerning this very subject.

Here are the big ideas and guidelines I crafted:

  1. Technology must be used to access critical thinking skills
  2. Technology is to be used to create, publish, and share voices.
  3. Technology is a means to share information and the teachers’ roles are to help students question and challenge that information.
  4. Technology makes the virtual and real world more accessible.
  5. Teach that technology is a tool: use the tool to build.

This is a start to how I think of technology. Currently, my greatest joy is providing a blog space via Edublogs for my students to write. Everyone student has access, from a first-year English learner, physical or special needs, highly capable, and so forth. My middle school students don’t trust me at first when I say they can write anything unless it promotes harm or hate. I am, first and foremost, an ELA teacher, with writing as my area of expertise. I can share wonderful stories such as Humans of New York, Storycorp, This American Life, The Moth, and many more. I can share CrashCourse and VSauce Youtube channels, and Khan Academy. There are podcasts, collaborative, problem-based learning ideas, engineering, coding, writing, creating: the idea is to have students become creators of content, not just consumers. These don’t replace curriculum, but help students engage.

https://mrskellylove.com/2017/11/05/job-description/

https://mrskellylove.com/2017/07/14/summer-saves-googling/

https://mrskellylove.com/2017/10/06/click-like-or-not/

https://mrskellylove.com/2017/09/26/flip-it-flip-it-good/

https://mrskellylove.com/2017/09/24/mind-the-map/

https://mrskellylove.com/2017/09/15/visible-invisibilia/

Note: this blog is my own teacher site. It is not shared with students, but other teachers from around the country in my PLN (Professional Learning Network.) It is not supported or sponsored in any way by my district. I pay for this and write on my own time. If you want to engage in a collaborative, constructive dialogue I am here.

“The Authority of Inscrutable…”

chris riddell

One constant, unrelenting message we educators hear is data are life. All are data. Data are all.*

And yet, I sense our fumblings and amateurish attempts to understand and analyze data fail us, and moreover, our students.

We are often told to ignore qualitative factors that any scientist worth her salt would question, annotate, and contextualize. In school, those reasonable questions might include what students are in honors classes, or block schedules, or are they suffering from depression, trauma, or discomfort of food or housing insecurities? Does the staff work in congruent cross-content, grade level teams with a cohort of students to care for, or is the staff independent silos that operate in a vacuum?

Recently we received our discipline data from our administration. There was an anonymous rank order of highest to lowest number of discipline referrals, and then in content-area PLCs, we were given envelopes with our own data number. The data was not segregated by type of discipline such as “repeated defiance or FYI’s” — just a number. For example, a teacher who might use the FYI as a way to track noticings about a student would receive the same number of a teacher who calls to have a student removed. The discussion was led with how to create relationships with our students, with the construct that the better the relationship the fewer referrals one has.

To say that it was embarrassing and degrading for many teachers is the truth: it also left us with more questions than answers. And human behavior consequence: if a teacher feels that he or she is “going to get in trouble” for a behavior that behavior stops. Teachers will not be as inclined to write up referrals if we believe our sins will be displayed by the whole staff, while some with fewer referrals feel…well, who knows what they’re feeling without all the information? Do we know as a staff which students received the most referrals? Is there a date for a meeting with parents?

I have a power of assessing on the down-low, a quiet way of listening to students’ conversations when they think I’m not there. For a large woman, I can walk up behind students without them noticing. It’s a skill that comes in handy. They talk about the teachers they “hate,” talk to each other, or think they’re hiding behind the many screens when they’re playing Roblox. Those relationships do matter, of course. But oftentimes I wonder if admin confuses ‘relationship’ with the student transforming complete personality reversals, or that it means “friend.”

It does not mean “friend.” I am a parent and a teacher. The last thing students need is friendship from adults: they need boundaries, constructive, transparent care, and the opportunity to come back in and out of grace. Today a student, who does not want to work with others, tried. It didn’t go well. I feel irresponsible for asking him to, but my evaluator wrote that on her observation. Something about making him a part of the “community.” But another teacher and I work with him, contact his father, and allow him time to work in our classrooms when we can. He doesn’t want to be part of a ‘community’ right now. And while I wish my classroom community looked like sunshine hilltops and fluffy bunny laughter, these are middle school kids, and I like the community just fine. I like those individual students can find their introverted niche while kids who like a partner find one. So far no one is left out or doesn’t have a say. Isn’t that what a functional community looks like?

When we are made to feel intimidated by the data, that we don’t understand it or are incapable of analyzing it, then the conversation sputters. I wish there was a follow-up on our most challenging students, so we can truly help. Until then, the numbers lie.

https://www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/580617765/can-we-trust-the-numbers

 

*I have a hard time with data being a plural noun.

 

Saving Summer: Book money.

This is a “before” picture while cleaning up my classroom before summer break. This represents about 1/3 of my classroom library. It did get organized, eventually.

I buy books. I buy too many books — well, there are never enough books, but yes, I do wish my district would buy more. The tug-of-war between the decision makers and the stakeholders (teachers and students) never seems to end. And while I scour for on-line freebies, curate as many titles as I can, nothing beats a new book, and especially, the right book, in the hands of a student who says they don’t like to read.

This thread on Twitter got my attention:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

This idea that children want their own things shouldn’t be overlooked or dismissed. It seems parents hand them cell phones instead of books. Understandable. I have no issue, nor should anyone, ever say one word about a student having things that make them feel special, included, and just plain good: cell phones, new shoes, the right snapback or glitter pens. This isn’t about how parents spend their money. Or teachers. It’s about how districts view books and book lending. It becomes punitive and constrictive. How many times have I heard “I hate to read!” when it may be more of a function of “I hate worrying about other people’s *!*$!” It is the NEW book, the ownership of a book, that makes a huge difference. No one to boss or manage the time spent reading, or being given “responsibility” of reading in class, bringing the text to and fro, possibly being charged a fine if it’s lost or damaged. (I have had countless copies of Cut by Patricia McCormick go missing.)

Next year I’m looking at spending around $180 on enough copies of Lord of the Flies. I can go to Donor’s Choose and maintain that post, and jump through new bureaucratic hoops my district set up. I can ask GoFundMe for some money, which feels awful since the last GoFundMe I gave to was a young man murdered by police. Yes, he was one of ours.

So, tell me, this community of mine, how do I get new books that children can choose, keep, and read without operating in my own bank account in the negative (yes, I do). Is it possible to change the mindset of the spending at the district level to alter how they distribute funds for books? Am I just asking naive and pointless questions? Probably.

It’s easier just to fill up the Amazon cart with what I want and move on. And I know why I’m always broke. But hey, if that new copy of The Hate U Give I gave to a student before the summer showed her how much I adore her, it’s a small price to pay.

Update: Deeper holes

This story: http://www.wnyc.org/story/americas-student-debt-crisis-bubble-about-burst

And what I said earlier:

student-loan-debt-info

This is going to sting a little: I have no more answers or insight than when I began. It’s as complicated as I imagined.

In other words: I don’t know. 

But it’s worse than I thought, too.

But there are plenty of people who will still tell me I’m wrong, or what to think, or mansplain it to me, or litigate it.

I don’t know.

The question: Why is college so expensive?

I made a comment about privatization and Wall Street (that synecdoche of our times)* being part of the problem for high costs of college, and two very different politically minded folks I knew took me to task on one end or gently probed (with the stinger of a scorpion I fear) on the other.

Here’s what I think and have experienced:

  1. I had a student loan for my Masters. It’s now in the neighborhood of 40K. I’ve been teaching for ten years. It’s only gone up because due to job losses, medical issues, etc. I’ve had to defer it several times. It’s at 4%. At this rate, I’ll never get it paid off.
  2. Sallie Mae split into two companies: Sallie Mae and Navient. I did not know this until my loan statements started coming from Navient. Navient is a private company.
  3. When trying to get a Sallie Mae/Navient loan for my older son, we were told we’d have to get a co-signer (due to all the deferments I’m sure, and is humiliating) and it would be over 12%. This website says 7.21% but that’s not what we were quoted, in writing.
  4. We applied to FAFSA for both boys. We don’t make enough to qualify for Pell Grants, (or do we?) and make too much to get inexpensive loans.
  5. I am applying to the 5K forgiveness. If I had a different kind of loan, and because work at a high poverty school, I could have obtained loan forgiveness for working there over ten years. As it is, due to the convoluted rules, I can’t. I would have had to see into the future when I obtained my loan.

Screen Shot 2016-05-30 at 9.42.13 AM

 

So why is college so expensive:

Some say it’s because of the administration bloat. This may have merit as my own district has spent its rainy day fund largely on administrative costs.

What cannot be defended, however, is the claim that tuition has risen because public funding for higher education has been cut. Despite its ubiquity, this claim flies directly in the face of the facts. –Paul Campos

So there’s money there, just not reaching students. Fairly common.

States subsidize costs — so—

That dramatic increase occurred because during this period many states developed large budget deficits. In the late 1980s and 1990s these budget deficits increased because of popular support for tax-cutting measures at all levels of government. To give voters lower taxes, states had to reduce public services. Welfare and poverty programs were cut first, but more cuts were necessary to keep the deficits under control.

Legislators tried to preserve their state college and university budgets for reasons of pride and prestige, but the budget ax soon fell on them as well. When state appropriations for these campuses were cut, college administrators had no choice but to raise tuition to make up for the shortfalls.

To understand the nationwide impact of these budget-driven tuition increases at state colleges and universities consider the fact that 80% of all American students enrolled in degree-granting, non-profit institutions attend publicly funded colleges and universities. The tuition increases at these public institutions directly affected the overwhelming majority of American students.–Bill Zimmerman

And people has diminished ability to pay:

Reduced Means

The problem is compounded because people are less able to pay. Incomes are stagnant, some parents are unemployed, and many can no longer get low-interest home-equity loans because home values have fallen.

So families have turned to federal student loans, and even much more expensive private loans.

“Private loans are much riskier than federal student loans, because they don’t come with the important repayment plans, forgiveness programs and other borrower protections that federal student loans provide,” Asher says.

The Obama administration has been rolling out a number of measures to help students in danger of falling behind on their federal loan payments.

Nearly a half-million students have signed up for “income-based repayment.” The program limits the amount of your income that you have to pay. And officials say many more students could be signing up for this program while they’re waiting for the economy to turn around.

Quora has a page with some very thoughtful responses, from what my friend said about subsidies causing increases to other valid reasons. The supply and demand argument feels flawed in some ways and completely obvious in others. We in education have taken on the mantle of ‘career and college ready,’ with a heavy focus on the college part. But these feels like medical bills to me: if more people get cheap loans from the government, why are universities raising their prices? What am I not getting? (Except broke.)

Could it be this is the privatization I spoke of? When I speak of Wall Street and privatization, there is a lot of money to be made in education. Someone is profiting. So maybe like single-payer healthcare, college expenses should be controlled.

Now — more anecdotal stuff coming — my two sons attend and will attend two different state-run colleges. The University of Washington may be considered more prestigious, and expensive, than Central Washington University. We are not interested in pedigreed sheepskins, and neither are our sons. They’re going to the right school for them. But for some parents that’s important:

The result is a winner takes all college admissions culture. In their quest for the very best education, students and their parents do whatever is necessary to get that name-brand degree, including going into massive debt.

But what’s not funny or fair is though it’s not important to us, our sons still want an education.

Even before grants and scholarshipskick in, state governments provide subsidies to make public colleges more affordable for their citizens. But those education subsidies began to dry up in the wake of the Great Recession. In 48 of 50 states, higher-education funding was reduced to rein in budget deficits. In 15 of those states, public funding for full-time college students was cut more than 30 percent from 2007 to 2012 [source: Malcolm]. In Washington, for example, the state only covered about 35 percent of the cost of college in 2012, down from 66 percent in 2008 [source: Kohl-Wells and Frockt].

 

This is an in-depth look at multiple factors about college costs: http://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/college-planning/admissions/10-reasons-college-costs-much3.htm

Knowing our luck historically, our boys will probably be out of college by the time Elizabeth Warren makes her stand.

10firstdraft-warren-education-tmagArticle

The GOP blocked her proposal, naturally. Maybe between Sanders and Clinton, something will be done. We know the Golden Wrecking Ball ain’t gonna help.

We’re trying to pay as much as we can cash and carry for our boys. My parents did that for me and was their gift for my future. It paid off. If our boys worked part time they could cover some expenses, but wouldn’t begin to cover tuition and housing. Due to a faulty medical bill we were denied a home equity loan, so that’s out of the picture for now. We are truly the middle-class poster couple right now. Everything you read about ‘someone else.’ Stagnant wages. Job loss. Hefty debt and interest. Destroyed retirement accounts.

So — please– do me one favor? Don’t speak to me about how it’s not privatization and Wall Street investors. It is. What is a public service has been privatized for profit. The EdReform movement comes at a high cost, and the EdReform movement is directly related to Wall Street. EdReform pushes college, public or private.

We’ll get through this, and come out the other side. But I don’t have time to argue, debate, litigate, or explain what is happening to me personally. This isn’t some policy discussion. I just want this reigned in, for my sons and my students. I feel like I’m making promises to them I can’t keep. Correction: we can’t keep.

We’ve ruined a lot of what makes our nation great. Let’s not screw this up, too.

 

*Hey, I know what ‘synecdoche’ means — does that give me any points?