WIHWT: Missing book

I forgot today was Wednesday. Just for a moment. And then I remembered today is my attempt to put something in under the “Wish I Had Written That” tag–been thinking a lot lately about dwarfs, drinking and eating dwarfs specifically, and the scene in The Hobbit (JRR Tolkien) where the dwarfs invade Bilbo Baggins’ hobbit hole, and food is simply, elegantly, found. It appears. Found, eaten, enjoyed, shared.

But I’m not going to write about that today.

I was also going to write about how it felt to be 99% done with my redo on my Board’s entry. Last year, I had joked about the five-stages of National Certification. But then I didn’t pass by five points, and I wasn’t laughing anymore. The redo entry is due this Friday. Along with our taxes. Along with my father-in-law’s birthday. And I haven’t taken care of any of that. And yes, the burden does fall on me. I’m feeling almost relieved, and now kind of, sort of, understand why people procrastinate: that adrenaline rush over crossing the finish line might be fairly addictive. That is, if the stress and anxiety doesn’t do me in first. I did the math: each point cost us a  minimum of $280 for a total of $1400, and that doesn’t include the ink cartridges, paper, or overnight shipping costs. And I say “us” because it’s our money.

And my state put a salary freeze for teachers for the next two years. I don’t really care. I’m grateful I have a job I love.

But I will write about this:

It’s no secret I’ve invested, sunk, spent, etc. a lot of my personal resources into my classroom. Today, just now, I was looking for a book I’ve had in past, in fact, I’ve had about three or four copies of this book, for a student in the reading class. I found its series, the second one, easily. But the first one – have no clue. So, I hopped right over to my trusty laptop, knowing that my Amazon account was good to go, to buy a few more copies of the book. Books go missing all the time – I don’t track them. I used to have a sign out sheet and most students who were interested in taking my personal books home were also pretty darn good about returning them. And, if a few didn’t make it back, what’s $10-$15 dollars here and there, if some child gets ownership of a good book?

Well–here is the book, and I want you to notice the fine print:

 Twelve KingdomsGuess I won’t be replacing this one anytime soon.

 

Postscript: (I did buy the $27.98 paperback “acceptable” condition copy, though…)

Pink and blue.

ghost-world-20110404-181112

I love Look At My Happy Rainbow. He is my kindergarten counter-weight to where all sprouts begin–I am at the other end of the spectrum in 8th grade, where the sprouts are at their awkward “just about to blossom” phase?! Oh dear – yuck. That’s an awful analogy.

And though right now I am about as hyper, distracted, and antsy as any boy who’s forced to where his Sunday best when he’d rather go fishin’, his post reminded me about one I said would write about the particular care and feeding of girls. I have a big project to finish over spring break, and I don’t wanna. And that’s the thing about boys — they tend to do what they want to do. And I’d rather do this. Just write for myself.

DO NOT misunderstand me, please. Men can be responsible, dependable, trustworthy, heart-ful souls. At least my husband, father, sons, and male friends I’ve had and have. Respectful, chivalrous, and brave. And carefully protective. My husband does not open doors for me, nor does he remember anything about toilet seat positioning, but his ‘absent minded professor’ demeanor is pretty endearing.

But how did these strong caring men become this way?

Gender issues in classroom, the work environment, and the world are complicated. We are all still parceling out roles and identities.

But I can tell you from a female perspective, there is one thing that never seems to change, no matter how many Dove beauty product commericials try to convince us otherwise, is most of us have a very distorted view of our physical selves.

So–maybe this is about two things: how girls get in the low self-esteem pitfalls, and how boys help push them in. How we all push each other not-so-gently into roles we’d rather not act.

We’re still reading Absolutey True. The chapter we left on is when the love interest, Penelope (PENELOPE? Sherman Alexie – Penelope? I don’t think there is a big case of caucasion girls being named Penelope in the states, but it’s your story, your character), and Junior discovers her big secret: she is suffering from bulemia.

Now, my second period class is famous/infamous for grand discussions. Whatever I thought I might have planned is directed by this group of highly inquisitive students. There is the full barage of personalities, even for a small class. I adore them.

I decided to share a personal story, one I have not shared with anyone, really, about my tiny, small brush with an eating disorder in high school. I had only ever heard the word “anoerxia” but never bulemia. When I was a sophomore and dating one of my first serious high school boyfriends, his passing comment to me was something to the effect that I had a big behind. Six words: “Your butt looks kind of big.”

Let me paint a picture: I was, am, close to 5’9″ (not quite), and weighed 128-132lbs. I don’t remember what size I wore, but probably around an 8/10. My figure was not boyish, but I was pretty thin.

This sent my fragile self-esteem into a tailspin: I went on the Scarsdale Diet, and went down to 117lbs.

Now, the boys in the class shocked me–this is definitely a generational/cultural perspective: they said that my boyfriend meant it as a compliment. I said, “Oh no–he most definitely did not.” When I was in high school telling a girl she had a big caboose was definitely not ‘junk in the trunk I like big butts and I cannot lie’ kind of thing.

Now Happy Rainbow said the comment (and I am paraphrasing because I’m too lazy to look up the exact quote), that even in kindergarten girls are more concerned with being cute than smart. I would caution Happy that any label can lead to a fixed mind set. No girl wants to be the “Velma” if she can be “Daphne.” I was kind of hoping we could be both in our brave new world. The Velma would be considered attractive, too, and Daphne’s IQ would be raised.  (Huh – no one ever worries about Shaggy or Fred, do they?)

Girls (and women) do not hear the same frequencies boys/men do. Let me explain. I proceeded to tell the boys in the class to be very, very careful in their comments to girls. If they want to be a gentleman and tell a girl she looks nice, say, “you look nice today.” Do not comment on particular body parts, shapes, etc. Some of the more, um, blunt boys said “what if we mean it in a nice way?” I could promise them, guarantee them, that it is never nice. And many of the girls quietly agreed. Their voices were muffled. But I looked them in the eye and told them that no boy’s comment is worth one’s self-worth.

My favorite uncle, who is wonderful, but complicated, said once that it was a shame that my grandfather wasn’t still alive because he kept everyone from getting fat with his comments and remarks. But I also remember my grandfather as being a gentleman, too. But my uncle is right – though I am back on track, if my grandfather had seen me in recent years there would have been tears. He would not have commented on my degrees, successes, triumphs– he would have commented on my weight. He’s not even on this astral plane and the inner dialogue is resonating.

Those sorts of hurtful side comments are lingering, poisonous dialogue in one’s head. Consider the hundreds of messages we are sending to both girls and boys about how their worth is measured.

So, little girls, big girls, and all in between, and to the boys who are their friends: be kind to each other.

The embed code is only available upon request: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U

Right to belong.

Loves

This is a photograph of me and my husband taken some years ago. I still look this way to him, and he to me. So, it’s a pretty accurate likeness. I posted it here to bring up a tough discussion, because like the race post, this is what my students are talking about, trying to navigate, and they need our love and support. You may not like it, or agree with it, but it’s my blog, I pay for it, I write it, and do a poor job of editing it. I want to know your thoughts, too. The conversation: sexual orientation.

It’s high school registration time, and the students are so a-flutter with excitement, class choices, and questions. Because institutions such as a public school do a fairly good job of divide-and-conquer, the task of hosting the high school counselors in my room does not fall on me; however, it does fall on the science teachers. Everyone has science. (And conversely, science loses a lot of instructional time because of this: it is the catch-all class. If you want students to see it, hear it, or know it, it happens during science class.) And the science teachers do an amazing job of understanding the forms and futures of our students. I do not. (I know the requirements for honors, and alas, this avenue will be closed for many of  my students. It’s a different ballgame, kids. Not Mrs. Love’s tightrope-balancing-angry cats-on-fire form of differentiation.)

There are club choices. And a student asked why does the high  have a Gay/Lesbian coalition club – what do they do there?

I answered this way (paraphrased): We are who we are. Our sexual, race, and cultural identities matter. But when we are born, no one says to us, “Hey, you choose your race right? So you chose your sexual orientation!” Students get this immediately. But two things: First, I feel sorely inadequate in my response. Human sexuality is far more complicated than this sense of “it’s not your fault” – argh! It makes me angry – and again, this pat answer is so weak in some ways, even if it does quickly put things in a new perspective for students. Second: The club is for students to show that they are strong, smart, and want to work together to do community, games, or social activities in a safe place where no one will give them any flak.

Something else made me take notice – there is a blog I follow where the writer strongly identifies himself as being gay. I think this may be the grown-up response to the high school club. I don’t know. I would love to have a conversation about it with him. The conflictual emotions spin me around: just as sometimes I wish there were never any boxes for students to check on the government forms – there is no box for multiracial, but two for Pacific Islander or Asian/Islander – huh? And just as I don’t read (and worship) David Sedaris because he’s a “gay” writer, nor do I watch (and worship) Jon Stewart because he’s “straight.” Talent is talent. If I learn something personal and insightful about Sedaris’ relationship with his parents/siblings as a result or in perspective of his sexual orientation, I am the better for it. Just as when I learned that Jon Stewart had master puzzle creator Will Shortz write a crossword puzzle for Jon’s future wife with a proposal, I swoon. But it’s love, growth, and heart that cause my emotional reaction. I am tired of those boxes and check-marks.

I predict (forgive my wide swing on this one–we Americans are a bit crazy and unpredictable sometimes) that in 1 to 100 years we will look back at gay marriage rights, or the denial of those legal, adult, mutually-agreed upon civil partnerships, as one of the greatest civil rights abuses of our times. Which is probably why the race and the sexual orientation issue gets uncomfortably boxed together.

My husband and I were free to go to a courthouse, pay a fee, sign a license, and stand in front of God and everyone (as my mother said) and make promises to each other. I wore a very beautiful dress, and he looked dashing in his tux. No one questioned it, protested it, or worried that “it’s okay for other people’s children, but why mine?” We weren’t concerned with how we were going to have a family, or move forward. Nothing stopped us.

I know I have students who may be gay. They don’t put a sign on their backs, but nor do they necessarily ‘hide’ either. And why should they? My own classroom is perhaps a weird bastion of acceptance (although not so true for the girls — another post). My first year teaching I had a young girl who decided she was a boy. Okay. I am not questioning any of that; what I question is how a green teacher like me could deal with her anger, outbursts, and general chaos. She had so much confusion going on inside her, and it was painful to watch. But all anyone wants is to be given respect. Simple. She moved out of state, and took with her my hard-bound copy of The Witch’s Boy by Michael Gruber.

Did you ever notice how the things that are bullied are our most vulnerable parts? Our sexuality, our race, our economic status? The things that are often out of our control? I want there to be clubs for every niche if that’s what it takes. I want people to distinguish or demarcate themselves however they choose. I guess when it comes down to it though, human rights are human rights. I just don’t want any more fodder for bullies. Mostly I want one big club: adult choices and freedom to make decisions.

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

WIHWT: Timeless romance.

I am not much of a ‘chick-flick’ kind of girl; however, this one may sweep me away, just like my adolescent self was swept over wind-whipped moors:

Movie link: http://www.focusfeatures.com/jane_eyre

Review link: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/movies/2014515987_eyre20.html?prmid=carousel_feat

And I think re-reading the book, just as I revisited Jane Austen as an adult, may be in order, too.

Foolish.

Okay – right after work today I’m running to Target to pick up a copy of Wii Dance Party. The PE teachers put out the call this morning that it is “Fitness Friday,” and a Wii Dance Party was ON. So, I grabbed my two teaching assistants and off we went. Oh my gosh–that is SO MUCH FUN.

(Prologue: Mrs. Love had been staring at the somewhat discouraging district data on her students’ reading scores. What was on that test, anyway? How to disarm a nuclear submarine? Dios mio.)

So, what else is there to do, but dance?

Meeting.

My nine lives are catching up to me. But I did manage to bring miniature pastries to my curriculum meeting this morning. And I waited until I got to work to put mascara on. I’m a safe driver.

Did we spend an inordinate amount of time talking about curriculum?

Well, yes and no.

New dates for our standardized test. Earlier than we had anticipated. And though all year we are “intentionally teaching  and using best practices,” there are some test taking skills that need to be reviewed.

Read that how you will.

And I’m going to try not to let my mascara run.

And put the pastries in the teachers’  lounge.

Far away from me.

*Postscript: Shared the pastries in my third period reading class instead. Much better choice.

Do the right thing.

I wasn’t sure I was going to write about this, so perhaps my colleagues, you will let me know your thoughts.

A new student transferred to my class a few weeks ago. Nothing unusual about this: we get new students all the time: current enrollment is over 850 students, 7&8th grade now. Just these past two weeks I’ve gotten two or three new students: shameful that I don’t know exactly? Yes. I agree. One of them has gang-related expulsion issues. I haven’t met her yet. Another has truancy issues. Haven’t met her yet either. Another quietly slipped in, barely said hello, and hasn’t said a word since. But I’m trying.

But one has made quite an impression on me. He’s engaging, outspoken, and takes up a lot of oxygen in the room. Not a problem. “Classroom Management” is one of those teacher catch-all phrases that can mean anything from “everyone has their head down and is doing their worksheets” to “the room isn’t on fire.”

He and I got off to perhaps a rocky start, not so much on my part: I let him know immediately how I expected the culture of my classroom to be, to feel, and even though he didn’t know me, he would have to believe in the actions of the other students that I have his best interest at heart, and to give me time, not judge me, but be respectful. At one point, I guess he was being disruptive, and I have my mother’s and grandmother’s “skill” of “resetting a room,” — just letting everyone know, right there and then, what is happening, what should stop happening, and where we are going: a student told the disruptive one, “Oh, Mrs. Love just put you in CHECK!”

Student decides he likes me–and if you teach, you know how critical this is to promote any learning. And if you teach at a  high-risk school, you know it’s as important as say, floors or oxygen. He is much taller than I am (I am almost 5’9″) and he greets me during passing time with a hearty side-hug and a “What up my N________!?”

There may be a different reaction from any given teacher. My reaction was, first, “Did he just say what I thought he said?” to , “Huh, better address that one soon!”

I wasn’t offended though. I know he meant it affectionately. The power of a word, owning it, saying it, is huge. But I would never consider, using this racial epithet in any context, unless it was a read aloud of Mice and Men, or Huckleberry Finn. And even then it would feel chalky in my mouth. I explained to this student the next morning (while he was being processed by another teacher for disruptions), about my views on this word, that I know he didn’t mean it to be disrespectful, but from my upbringing and values, couldn’t put a mere “pass” on it, because people died fighting for civil rights, and the dignity to be addressed as a human. If one person doesn’t have their rights, no one does.

But my little talk doesn’t make racism go away.

Fast forward to the Absolutely True read aloud. We get to the chapter where Junior talks about the rules of fisticuffs (try explaining that one) and the GIANT WHITE BOY’S most extreme racist joke*. And then try to explain why the joke is so offensive. Sherman Alexie first eases the reader into this with the use of the school’s Indian mascot. Some of the students smirk at this, but most do not. I stop and illustrate: “What if our school had a Mexican wearing a sombrero, taking a nap under a cactus?”  (Most Hispanic students laugh). Or, an African American mascot standing out in a cotton field? Or a overweight white lady wearing polyester pants with a big jar of mayonnaise?

The *joke is so offensive because it dehumanizes. We talked about why, when Junior punches the racist student, the student just looks hurt, and dismissive. Every student answered it was because the GIANT WHITE BOY was scared of Junior, or Junior was crazy. Not one of them saw that it was because the white kids saw Junior as less than human, less than worthy of his attention.

I won’t be hypocritical here either. I think it’s funny when in “Raising Arizona” a mean-spirited and ignorant character tells a off-color Polish joke to a Polish polish officer. I appreciate when humorists do crafted satire to show how ridiculous stereotypes can be. And how could I be mad when student sincerely greets me with his warmest version of hello?

It just means that I will take those opportunities to explain why. That’s the right thing to do.

Fish on Fridays.

During second period, everyday, like a call to prayer, are the morning announcements.

Having first period as my planning time this year means that by the time second period starts, that’s my first class of the day, and when the show really begins. The lunch menu is dutifully announced, and although I would much prefer to hear “Today’s lunch choices are a filet mignon with a mushroom wine sauce, and lemon meringue pie, alas, these are never the offerings. Today is Friday. There will be a fillet-of-fish sandwich (was that something that swam in the ocean at one point?) and clam chowder.

Now, I like really good clam chowder. This is not that. It’s gummy, gluey, and gooey.

But I’m not complaining about the soup: I am remarking on the fact that public school cafeterias still serve fish on Fridays, a tradition from my elementary school days (insert, Mrs. Love, you look like you’re 27! —thank you my silly and well-meaning students, thank you…) While being served  fish on Fridays, and I hated “fish” back then, not knowing what dungeness or Maryland crab feasts meant, or the ecstasy of lobster tails, shrimp, mahi mahi, etc., I asked my parents, “Why did the cafeteria serve fish on every single blazing Friday?” “It’s because Catholics don’t eat meat on Fridays.”

I’m not really sure to this day what we “were,” — I have a baptismal certificate from the Methodist church, and my paternal grandfather scoffed at me when I thought of changing to Episcopalian (my humble grandfather thought it was for “rich people”).  I know the Catholic traditions seemed completely mystfying at the time, and it wasn’t until college where a very dear friend took me to mass, where I awkwardly sat out the wine/wafer communion phase, that I had any exposure to this brand of faith.

Still really didn’t explain the fish thing.

Something about sacrifice, giving up something better as a punishment, etc. As far as I could tell, I was being forced to sacrifice and was being punished, too. Unfair.

Fast forward: What do we expect our students to compromise on, to ‘give up?’

Budgets are slashed. Nutrition is questionable. Resources are frayed.  And I’m not really sure why I’m writing about clam chowder. Is it a metaphor for ancient, antiquated school traditions that have no real or current relevance in our country today? What hold-overs do we live under that are unseen to us and to our students? (Trust me — they never once questioned why there is clam chowder and fish sandwiches every single Friday.)

I don’t know. It just struck me as odd, to honor one faith in a serving of fish and not necessarily others. Yes, there are “vegetarian” choices for those students whose faiths prevent them from eating anything with a face or family. Tolerance and cultural demands seem as distant as my plastic lunch tray with fish, too.

Something else that sparked my interest: “How to Get Into a Crowded High School?” http://kuow.org/program.php?id=22899

And the simple question: Why not make all schools as good as Garfield goes unanswered.

That’s tough to swallow.